Tax Controversy and Litigation
Published: To Our Clients And Friends, November 11, 2015
Published: New York Law Journal, February 20, 2014
Published: New York Law Journal, December 19, 2013
Published: New York Law Journal, March 8, 2013
Published: New York Law Journal, December 20, 2012
IRS Provides Detailed Guidance on 2012 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program and Announces New Alternative Procedure for Certain Taxpayers Living Abroadby Michael J. Miller, Richard A. Levine, Howard J. Levine, Mark David Rozen, Ellen Seiler Brody
Published: R&H Letter to Clients and Friends, July 3, 2012
Published: New York Law Journal, June 21, 2012
Published: Journal of Taxation, May 01, 2012
An Absolute Provision Is Not Always So Absolute, Revisted -- En Banc Rehearing Brings Common Sense Backby Ellen Seiler Brody
Published: Journal of Taxation, January 01, 2012
Published: R&H Letter to Clients & Friends, February 09, 2011
Published: Journal of Taxation, February 01, 2011
Published: Journal of Taxation, August 01, 2010
Published: Journal of Taxation, July 01, 2010
Published: New York Law Journal, April 15, 2010
BLAK Affirms the Necessity of Raising Statute of Limitations Defense Early in TEFRA Partnership Proceedingsby Elliot Pisem
Published: Journal of Taxation, April 01, 2010
Published: R&H Letter to Clients & Friends, March 03, 2010
Tax Court Decisions on Section 6707A Penalty Deny Prepayment Forum and Extend Statute of Limitationsby Elliot Pisem
Published: Journal of Taxation, March 01, 2010
Published: R&H Letter to Clients and Friends, September 24, 2009
The Uncertain Boundary Between 'Partner-Level' and 'Partnership-Level' Defenses Under the Partnership Audit Rulesby Elliot Pisem
Published: Journal of Taxation, September 01, 2009
Published: R&H Letter to Clients and Friends, July 22, 2009
Published: Journal of Taxation of Investments, July 01, 2009
The Tax Court's Surprising About-Face on the Scope of Sanctions Against the IRS for Attorney MisconductPublished: BNA Tax & Accounting, June 25, 2008
Published: Journal of Taxation, May 01, 2008
Published: The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel, November 01, 2004
Published: New York Law Journal, June 16, 1999
Published: R & H Newsletter -- Tax Litigation & Procedure, September 01, 1998
Published: R & H Newsletter -- Tax Litigation & Procedure, June 01, 1998
Published: R & H Newsletter -- Tax Litigation & Procedure, January 01, 1998
Published: R & H Newsletter -- Tax Litigation & Procedure, October 01, 1997
Published: R & H Newsletter -- Tax Litigation & Procedure, February 01, 1997
Published: R & H Newsletter -- Tax Litigation & Procedure, November 01, 1996
Federal Tax Litigation
Tax controversy work is a substantial part of our practice. All of our lawyers participate actively with clients and their accountants in the process of resolving tax controversies at the audit and appellate levels of the IRS. Our objective is to resolve tax disputes as early in the process as possible and without the need for litigation. This is amply demonstrated by the number of favorable settlements of multi-million dollar tax deficiencies we have negotiated. These have included Section 482 transfer pricing cases, “straddles” in stock options and commodities futures, partnership allocations, tort damage settlements, and income and estate tax valuation matters. We have handled employee/independent contractor status matters for a bond trading house, a series of international corporate restructurings, and several large cases involving scores of complicated issues for Fortune 500 companies.
When litigation is unavoidable, or chosen as a tactical alternative, our clients’ cases are handled by litigators who are complete tax lawyers, experienced in transactional planning as well as litigation. In contrast, other firms attempt to litigate tax cases using attorneys who do not deal regularly with the subtle nuances of the tax law or the special rules of the Tax Court and the Court of Federal Claims. Our attorneys have written BNA Portfolios on both Tax Court Litigation and Refund Litigation. One of our attorneys was, for many years, chief litigator of tax cases for the Justice Department in the U.S. Court of Claims and another served in the litigation division of the National Office of the IRS. We have represented clients in the U.S. Tax Court, federal district and appellate courts and the U.S. Court of Claims. Our attorneys have also litigated tax claims in the U.S. Bankruptcy Courts and constitutional issues in both federal and state courts. In addition to arguing appeals of cases we originally tried, we also have been brought in to argue appeals of cases tried by others.
Issues litigated for clients have included partnership basis swap issues, distributions in corporate redemptions, the impact of buy-sell agreements on controlled foreign corporation status, tax basis of patents, research and development expenditures, and the open transaction doctrine. We have also litigated executive employment contracts, the investment interest deduction, the valuation of minority interests, tax penalties, and a variety of tax-shelter issues including T-Bill option “straddles.” Although we do not act as trial counsel in criminal cases, we represent clients in tax fraud investigations or where there is a concern that tax fraud might be asserted, with the objective of avoiding criminal indictment.
New York Tax Litigation
Our very active tax controversy practice involves virtually every type of New York State and City tax. Its scope covers the entire process, from audit through administrative hearings, to appeals in the New York courts. We have successfully litigated cases under all the New York State and City taxes, including the Personal Income, Corporate Franchise, General Corporation, Unincorporated Business, Sales and Use, Commercial Rent and Occupancy, and Real Property Gains and Transfer taxes.
We have represented multinational corporations, banks, utilities, developers and real estate and investment partnerships in cases involving such complex issues as nexus, combination, allocation, engaging in a trade or business and retroactive application of the tax laws. We have also litigated matters involving the special taxes on banks, utilities and telecommunications companies and have settled several multi-million dollar cases involving the impact of City taxes on the securities and real estate industries.
New York’s high income, gift and estate taxes often cause individuals to seek to change their residence. The tax authorities often challenge such attempts. Our extensive experience with the controversy aspects of residency, together with the special considerations relating to owning New York property, uniquely position us to assist clients in this area. We have successfully defended scores of high net worth individuals in State and City residency cases and won several landmark decisions.